我试图合并两个(预排序)双链表在一起,它不断得到无限循环或一个元素列表时,试图添加。
下面代码的预期结果应该是:
[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
So I Have:
public static void main(String[] args) {
TheLinkedList<Integer> oddList = new TheLinkedList<Integer>();
TheLinkedList<Integer> evenList = new TheLinkedList<Integer>();
// Test lists
oddList.add(new Integer(9));
oddList.add(new Integer(7));
oddList.add(new Integer(5));
oddList.add(new Integer(3));
oddList.add(new Integer(2));
oddList.add(new Integer(1));
evenList.add(new Integer(8));
evenList.add(new Integer(6));
evenList.add(new Integer(4));
evenList.add(new Integer(2));
evenList.add(new Integer(0));
//System.out.println(oddList.toString());
//System.out.println(evenList.toString());
oddList.merge(evenList);
//System.out.println(theList.toString());
}
注意,这是在一个不同的类中,你不能直接访问oddList或evenList
// Self explanatory getter and setter methods
public void add(T newValue) {
head = new Node<T>(newValue, head, null);
if (head.getNext() != null)
head.getNext().setPrevious(head);
else
tail = head;
count++;
}
public void merge(TheLinkedList<T> two) {
do {
if (head.getValue().compareTo(two.head.getValue()) <= 0) {
head = head.getNext();
continue;
}
if (head.getValue().compareTo(two.head.getValue()) >= 0){
two.head = two.head.getNext();
}
} while (head != null && two.head != null);
}
我没有看到任何实际的合并在这里?假设列表按降序排列,您应该比较一个列表的头部与另一个列表的头部,如果另一个列表的值小于主列表的值,则应该将该值插入到主列表的头部节点的下一个节点,然后继续到下一个值。你需要小心,因为你添加到主列表的节点需要引用下一项和上一项,如果它适合的话。
如果顺序不能保证,那么据我所知,你需要先对列表进行排序,然后合并它们,以防止在最坏的情况下多次遍历整个引用链表。
编辑:这里有一个代码示例。你也可以用递归来做,但是递归让我头疼,所以…
public void merge(TheLinkedList<T> two) {
Node workingNodeOnOne = this.head;
Node workingNodeOnTwo = two.head;
while (workingNodeOnTwo != null)
if (workingNodeOnOne.getValue().compareTo(workingNodeOnTwo.getValue()) < 0) {
//this is if the value of your second working node is greater than the value of your first working node.
//add the two.head.getValue() value of your current list here before the first working node...
this.addBefore(workingNodeOnTwo.getValue(), workingNodeOnOne)
//note that this does change the value of this.head, but it doesn't matter as we are sorted desc anyways
//given the constraints of what you have presented, you should never even hit this code block
workingNodeOnTwo = workingNodeOnTwo.next();
}
else { //this is if the head value of second list is less than or equal to current head value, so just insert it after the current value here
this.add(workingNodeOnTwo.getValue(), workingNodeOnOne); //insert the value of the second working node after our current working node
workingNodeOnOne = workingNodeOnOne.next();
workingNodeOnTwo = workingNodeOnTwo.next(); //go on to the next nodes
}
}
这肯定需要一些调整,这取决于你的实现,但逻辑是合理的,我相信。