基于cuda的简单矩阵乘法中的nan误差


I started to write some simple cuda code recently. Please see my code below. 
#include "matrix_multiplication.h"
void MatMul(const Matrix A, const Matrix B, Matrix C)
{
  Matrix d_A;
  d_A.width = A.width;
  d_A.height = A.height;
  size_t size = A.width*A.height*sizeof(float);
  cudaError_t err = cudaMalloc(&d_A.elements,size);
  printf("CUDA malloc A: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  err = cudaMemcpy(d_A.elements,A.elements,size,cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
  printf("Copy A to device: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  Matrix d_B;
  d_B.width = B.width;
  d_B.height = B.height;
  size = B.width*B.height*sizeof(float);
  err = cudaMalloc(&d_B.elements,size);
  printf("CUDA malloc B: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  err = cudaMemcpy(d_B.elements,B.elements,size,cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
  printf("Copy B to device: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  Matrix d_C;
  d_C.width = C.width;
  d_C.height = C.height;
  size = C.width*C.height*sizeof(float);
  err = cudaMalloc(&d_C.elements,size);
  printf("CUDA malloc C: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  dim3 dimBlock(BLOCK_SIZE, BLOCK_SIZE);
  dim3 dimGrid((B.width + dimBlock.x -1)/dimBlock.x,(A.height +
        dimBlock.y -1)/dimBlock.y);
  MatMulKernel<<<dimGrid,dimBlock>>>(d_A,d_B,d_C);
  err = cudaThreadSynchronize();
  printf("Run kernel: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  err =
    cudaMemcpy(C.elements,d_C.elements,size,cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);
  printf("Copy C off of device: %sn",cudaGetErrorString(err));
  cudaFree(d_A.elements);
  cudaFree(d_B.elements);
  cudaFree(d_C.elements);
}
__global__ void MatMulKernel(Matrix A, Matrix B, Matrix C)
{
  float Cvalue = 0.0;
  int row = blockIdx.y * blockDim.y + threadIdx.y;
  int col = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
  if(row > A.height || col > B.width) return;
  for(int e = 0; e < A.width; ++e)
  {
    Cvalue +=(A.elements[row*A.width + e]) * (B.elements[e*B.width +
        col]);
  }
  C.elements[row*C.width + col] = Cvalue;
}

结果如下(5乘5矩阵(,它有时在一些元素中包含nan或无意义值。

2 1 2 0 0

nan 1 2 1

1 0 2 1

nan 0 2 1 0

3 1 4 2 1

我想不出原因。请帮我一下。非常感谢。

内核内部的绑定检查应该是这样的:

if(row >= A.height || col >= B.width) return;

如果没有=符号,您将在计算中包含(width+height-1(个额外的线程,这将执行越界内存访问并导致未定义的行为。

最新更新