1(有没有办法输入这个? 2(有人能够解释这些错误消息吗?
let identity1: 'a => 'a = [%bs.raw {|
function(value) {
return value
}
|}];
/*
Line 2, 11: The type of this expression, '_a -> '_a, contains type variables that cannot be generalized
*/
let identity2: 'a. 'a => 'a = [%bs.raw {|
function(value) {
return value
}
|}];
/*
Line 8, 11: This definition has type 'a -> 'a which is less general than 'a0. 'a0 -> 'a0
*/
https://reasonml.github.io/en/try.html?reason=FAGwpgLgBAlgJmAdhGECeBGAXFA5AQygF4A%20PQoqAbQFIAjAZwDoAnfAdygG8AfYKKADMArogDGKAPaIAFADd8IYWACU3fgKgtIwloigKlYDQF9gPEwF0A3MGAB6AFTAAMjERgoAJgA0UDNhQACoAFp7oAA6ekoJQECEwDFBgAB4R2gwMMNJ%20uAD6hAC0ZPn4fmLSEPjuSZGeCiww%20HTgtSH40GL4iIiS0HSeAOZIYGwgMABeYHDAjvZ24NDwSCjoXjgETOTEJRTU9MxsnLwaIuJSsobKalwaAtoQuvpXxgJmFjZ2Tq7ungAcfgCOFCiSgCEE7lQ2X07VqaCi22K23YCTEIVgSVaSWGHjGcXa%20gIAAYtsSoEjibN5kA
bs.raw
是有效的(准确地说是扩展的(,因此它受到值限制:http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/polymorphism.html#sec51 .
简而言之,函数应用程序的结果类型不能一概而论,因为它可能捕获了一些隐藏的引用。例如,考虑以下函数:
let fake_id () = let store = ref None in fun y ->
match !store with
| None -> y
| Some x -> store := Some x; y
let not_id = fake_id ()
let x = not_id 3
那么not_id
的下一个应用将是3
.因此,not_id
的类型无法∀'a. 'a -> 'a
。这就是为什么类型检查器为您的函数推断类型'_weak1 -> '_weak1
(使用 4.06 表示法(。此类型_weak1
不是多态类型,而是未知混凝土类型的占位符。
在正常设置中,解决方案是使not_id
成为具有η扩展的值:
let id x = fake_id () x
(* or *)
let id: 'a. 'a -> 'a = fun x -> fake_id () x