我有一个用户foo,具有以下权限(它不是任何组的成员):
{
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1308813201865",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar"
}
]
}
然而,该用户似乎无法上传或做任何事情,直到我授予完全访问身份验证的用户(这可能适用于任何人)。这仍然不允许用户更改权限,因为boto在上传后试图执行do key.set_acl('public-read')
时抛出错误。
理想情况下,这个用户将完全访问bar
桶,没有别的,我做错了什么?
您需要将s3:ListBucket权限授予桶本身。试试下面的策略。
{
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "S3:*",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar/*",
"Condition": {}
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar",
"Condition": {}
}
]
}
选择的答案不适合我,但这个可以:
{
"Statement": [
{
"Action": "s3:*",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket",
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*"
]
}
],
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
}
]
}
信用:http://mikeferrier.com/2011/10/27/granting-access-to-a-single-s3-bucket-using-amazon-iam/
您了解AWS策略生成器吗?
有一份AWS官方文档:写IAM策略:如何授予对Amazon S3桶的访问权限
只需复制并粘贴适当的规则,并在所有语句中将"资源"键更改为您的桶的ARN。
对于编程访问,策略应该是:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar"]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:PutObjectAcl",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar/*"]
}
]
}
对于控制台访问访问应该是:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetBucketLocation",
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar"]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:PutObjectAcl",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bar/*"]
}
]
}
这对我有用:
{
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:GetBucketLocation",
"s3:ListBucketMultipartUploads",
"s3:ListBucketVersions"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bucket_name_here"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*Object*",
"s3:ListMultipartUploadParts",
"s3:AbortMultipartUpload"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bucket_name_here/*"
}
]
}
如果你一直在拔头发,因为你不明白为什么Cyberduck不能设置对象acl,但它与另一个客户端(如Panic Transmit)一起工作,这里是解决方案:
您需要将s3:GetBucketAcl
添加到您的Action列表中,例如:
{
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1",
"Action": [
"s3:GetBucketAcl",
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:DeleteObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:PutObjectAcl"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket-name"
}
]
}
当然,如果您对s3:*
的限制较少,则不需要这样做,但我认为知道这一点很好。
@cloudberryman的答案是正确的,但我喜欢让事情尽可能简短。这个答案可以简化为:
{
"Statement":[
{
"Effect":"Allow",
"Action":"S3:*",
"Resource":[
"arn:aws:s3:::bar",
"arn:aws:s3:::bar/*"
]
}
]
}
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetBucketLocation",
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::YOUR-BUCKET",
"arn:aws:s3:::YOUR-BUCKET/*"
]
}
]
}
我最近使用的另一种方法是使用Amazon的文档。对我来说,关键是将IAM User 指向特定的桶,而不是S3控制台。根据文档,"警告:在更改这些权限之后,用户在访问主Amazon S3控制台时会得到Access Denied错误。主控制台链接类似于以下内容:
https://s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/home相反,用户必须使用到该桶的直接控制台链接来访问该桶,类似于以下操作:
https://s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/awsexamplebucket/"
我的策略如下:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1589486662000",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::AWSEXAMPLEBUCKET",
"arn:aws:s3:::AWSEXAMPLEBUCKET/*"
]
}
]
}