我有并且很容易选择:
define account_id = 7
select * from A where ACCOUNT_ID = &account_id
UNION
select * from B where ACCOUNT_ID = &account_id;
我想让account_id作为另一个选择的输入,我是这样做的:
select * from A where ACCOUNT_ID in(select accound_id from ACCOUNTS where EMAIL like 'aa@aa.com') -- id 7 returned
UNION
select * from B where ACCOUNT_ID in(select accound_id from ACCOUNTS where EMAIL like 'aa@aa.com')
如何优化只呼叫select accound_id from ACCOUNTS where EMAIL like 'aa@aa.com'
一次?
我的第一个问题是union
是否可以用union all
代替。 因此,我的第一个尝试是使用exists
和union all
:
select a.*
from a
where exists (select 1
from accounts aa
where aa.account_id = a.account_id and
aa.email = 'aa@aa.com'
)
union all
select b.*
from b
where exists (select 1
from accounts aa
where aa.account_id = b.account_id and
aa.email = 'aa@aa.com'
);
对于此结构,您需要在accounts(account_id, email)
上建立索引。exists
只是查找索引中的值。 这确实需要扫描a
和b
。
如果查询返回少量行,并且您想要删除重复项,则union
并替换union all
。 如果它返回一大组行 - 并且每个表中没有重复项,并且有一种简单的方法来识别重复项 - 那么您可以改为执行以下操作:
with cte_a as (
select a.*
from a
where exists (select 1
from accounts aa
where aa.account_id = a.account_id and
aa.email = 'aa@aa.com'
)
)
select cte_a.*
from ctea_a
union all
select b.*
from b
where exists (select 1
from accounts aa
where aa.account_id = b.account_id and
aa.email = 'aa@aa.com'
) and
not exists (select 1
from cte_a
where cte_a.? = b.? -- whatever is needed to identify duplicates
);
这就是WITH
派上用场的地方
WITH ids AS (select account_id from ACCOUNTS where EMAIL like 'aa@aa.com')
select * from A where ACCOUNT_ID in ids
UNION ALL
select * from B where ACCOUNT_ID in ids;
我也把它改成了UNION ALL
,因为它快得多。