是否有任何内置函数来获得scikit-learn中二元概率分类器的最大精度?
。为了获得最大的f1分数,我这样做:
# AUCPR
precision, recall, thresholds = sklearn.metrics.precision_recall_curve(y_true, y_score)
auprc = sklearn.metrics.auc(recall, precision)
max_f1 = 0
for r, p, t in zip(recall, precision, thresholds):
if p + r == 0: continue
if (2*p*r)/(p + r) > max_f1:
max_f1 = (2*p*r)/(p + r)
max_f1_threshold = t
我可以用类似的方式计算最大精度:
accuracies = []
thresholds = np.arange(0,1,0.1)
for threshold in thresholds:
y_pred = np.greater(y_score, threshold).astype(int)
accuracy = sklearn.metrics.accuracy_score(y_true, y_pred)
accuracies.append(accuracy)
accuracies = np.array(accuracies)
max_accuracy = accuracies.max()
max_accuracy_threshold = thresholds[accuracies.argmax()]
但是我想知道是否有任何内置功能
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
from sklearn.metrics import roc_curve
fpr, tpr, thresholds = roc_curve(y_true, probs)
accuracy_scores = []
for thresh in thresholds:
accuracy_scores.append(accuracy_score(y_true, [m > thresh for m in probs]))
accuracies = np.array(accuracy_scores)
max_accuracy = accuracies.max()
max_accuracy_threshold = thresholds[accuracies.argmax()]
我开始改进解决方案,将thresholds = np.arange(0,1,0.1)
转换为一种更智能的、寻找最大值的二分类方法
我在下面写了很多注释来解释我的代码。请随意删除所有这些以使代码更具可读性。
import numpy as np
# Definition : we predict True if y_score > threshold
def ROC_curve_data(y_true, y_score):
y_true = np.asarray(y_true, dtype=np.bool_)
y_score = np.asarray(y_score, dtype=np.float_)
assert(y_score.size == y_true.size)
order = np.argsort(y_score) # Just ordering stuffs
y_true = y_true[order]
# The thresholds to consider are just the values of score, and 0 (accept everything)
thresholds = np.insert(y_score[order],0,0)
TP = [sum(y_true)] # Number of True Positives (For Threshold = 0 => We accept everything => TP[0] = # of postive in true y)
FP = [sum(~y_true)] # Number of True Positives (For Threshold = 0 => We accept everything => TP[0] = # of postive in true y)
TN = [0] # Number of True Negatives (For Threshold = 0 => We accept everything => we don't have negatives !)
FN = [0] # Number of True Negatives (For Threshold = 0 => We accept everything => we don't have negatives !)
for i in range(1, thresholds.size) : # "-1" because the last threshold
# At this step, we stop predicting y_score[i-1] as True, but as False.... what y_true value say about it ?
# if y_true was True, that step was a mistake !
TP.append(TP[-1] - int(y_true[i-1]))
FN.append(FN[-1] + int(y_true[i-1]))
# if y_true was False, that step was good !
FP.append(FP[-1] - int(~y_true[i-1]))
TN.append(TN[-1] + int(~y_true[i-1]))
TP = np.asarray(TP, dtype=np.int_)
FP = np.asarray(FP, dtype=np.int_)
TN = np.asarray(TN, dtype=np.int_)
FN = np.asarray(FN, dtype=np.int_)
accuracy = (TP + TN) / (TP + FP + TN + FN)
sensitivity = TP / (TP + FN)
specificity = TN / (FP + TN)
return((thresholds, TP, FP, TN, FN))
整个过程只是一个循环,算法也很简单。事实上,这个愚蠢的简单函数比我之前提出的解决方案快10倍(计算thresholds = np.arange(0,1,0.1)
的精度),比我之前的smart-ass- dychotom- algorithm快30倍…
def max_accuracy(thresholds, TP, FP, TN, FN) :
accuracy = (TP + TN) / (TP + FP + TN + FN)
return(max(accuracy))
def max_min_sensitivity_specificity(thresholds, TP, FP, TN, FN) :
sensitivity = TP / (TP + FN)
specificity = TN / (FP + TN)
return(max(np.minimum(sensitivity, specificity)))
如果你想测试它:
y_score = np.random.uniform(size = 100)
y_true = [np.random.binomial(1, p) for p in y_score]
data = ROC_curve_data(y_true, y_score)
%matplotlib inline # Because I personnaly use Jupyter, you can remove it otherwise
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.step(data[0], data[1])
plt.step(data[0], data[2])
plt.step(data[0], data[3])
plt.step(data[0], data[4])
plt.show()
print("Max accuracy is", max_accuracy(*data))
print("Max of Min(Sensitivity, Specificity) is", max_min_sensitivity_specificity(*data))
享受;)