尝试通过Jena接口使用PelletReasoner仅列出知识(新三元组)。我只想要在应用托盘推理器和InfModel从本体(OWL)后生成的推断数据。目前,我列出了所有的个体-其中包含断言和推断的知识。
那么我怎么能得到只有推断的知识从猫头鹰。提前感谢……
//Inference Logic//
com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.Reasoner reasoner = org.mindswap.pellet.jena.PelletReasonerFactory.theInstance().create();
Model infModel = ModelFactory.createInfModel(reasoner, ModelFactory.createDefaultModel());
OntModel model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel(OntModelSpec.OWL_DL_MEM, infModel);
try
{
inputStream = new FileInputStream(OWL_File);
}
catch (FileNotFoundException p)
{
p.printStackTrace();
}
model.read(inputStream, null, "RDF/XML");
下面的代码创建了一个简单的OntModel类B和a,其中B ⊑A,而i是b类型的个体。我们可以推断,例如,i是A的一个实例,我们将在结果中看到这一点。
import org.mindswap.pellet.jena.PelletReasonerFactory;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.ontology.OntClass;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.ontology.OntModel;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.ontology.OntModelSpec;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.InfModel;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.Model;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.ModelFactory;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.Statement;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.impl.StmtIteratorImpl;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.util.iterator.ExtendedIterator;
import com.hp.hpl.jena.util.iterator.Filter;
public class JustTheDeductionsPlease {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Create the base model. B is a subclass of A, and i is an instance of B.
String NS = "http://example.org/";
final OntModel model = ModelFactory.createOntologyModel( OntModelSpec.OWL_DL_MEM );
OntClass a = model.createClass( NS+"A" );
OntClass b = model.createClass( NS+"B" );
a.addSubClass( b );
model.createIndividual( NS+"i", b );
// Create the inference model.
InfModel pModel = ModelFactory.createInfModel( PelletReasonerFactory.theInstance().create(), model);
// An iterator over the statements of pModel that *aren't* in the base model.
ExtendedIterator<Statement> stmts = pModel.listStatements().filterDrop( new Filter<Statement>() {
@Override
public boolean accept(Statement o) {
return model.contains( o );
}
});
// For convenient printing, we create a model for the deductions.
// (If stmts were a StmtIterator, we could add it directly. It's not,
// so we end up creating a new StmtIteratorImpl, which is kludgey, but
// it's more efficient than converting the thing to a list.)
Model deductions = ModelFactory.createDefaultModel().add( new StmtIteratorImpl( stmts ));
deductions.write( System.out, "TTL" );
}
}
整个输出有点大,因为有很多纯粹基于owl的结论。我们最清楚地看到纯演绎结果的地方是我们定义的类和个体。注意,例如,B被列为自身和owl:Thing的子类,但不是a的子类(因为a在原始模型中),并且i的类型是owl:Thing和a,但不是B(因为B也在原始模型中):
<http://example.org/A>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf>
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing> , <http://example.org/A> ;
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#disjointWith>
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Nothing> ;
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass>
<http://example.org/A> .
<http://example.org/B>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf>
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing> , <http://example.org/B> ;
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#disjointWith>
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Nothing> ;
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentClass>
<http://example.org/B> .
<http://example.org/i>
a <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing> , <http://example.org/A> ;
<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs>
<http://example.org/i> .