从我在网上读到的内容来看,{fmt} 库应该比字符串流快得多。
但是,我做了一些简单的基准测试(测量系统时间,请参阅下面的代码(,似乎{fmt}总是比字符串流慢。我做错了什么吗?
uint64_t start;
uint64_t stop;
long MAXCOUNT = 10000000;
std::srand(123);
int* numbers = new int[MAXCOUNT];
for ( int i = 0; i < MAXCOUNT; i++) {
numbers[i] = std::rand();
}
{
std::string result;
start = currentTimeInMillis();
for ( int i = 0; i < MAXCOUNT; i++) {
result += fmt::format("Number {} is great!", numbers[i]);
}
stop = currentTimeInMillis();
fmt::print("timing fmt : {} ms / string length: {}n", stop-start, result.size());
}
{
std::string result;
std::stringstream ss;
start = currentTimeInMillis();
for ( int i = 0; i < MAXCOUNT; i++) {
ss << "Number " << numbers[i] << " is great!";
}
result = ss.str();
stop = currentTimeInMillis();
fmt::print("timing stds: {} ms / string length: {}n", stop-start, result.size());
}
此代码的典型结果(优化级别 O3 - 越少越差(是:
timing fmt : 1414 ms / string length: 264823200
timing stds: 1287 ms / string length: 264823200
首先,我的机器上没有得到相同的数字,对我来说fmt
更快:
timing fmt : 1713 ms / string length: 264825935
timing stds: 2483 ms / string length: 264825935
二、为了得到一个公平的比较,替换
result += fmt::format("Number {} is great!", numbers[i]);
跟
fmt::format_to(std::back_inserter(result), "Number {} is great!", numbers[i]);
这改善了(再次在我的机器上(的时间
timing fmt : 1153 ms / string length: 264825935
timing stds: 2482 ms / string length: 264825935