我具有以下绑定:
function atexit(proc : access Procedure) return Integer with
Import, Convention => C;
以及过程:
procedure Exiting is
begin
Put_Line("Exiting");
end Exiting;
当我尝试称其为:
时I : Integer := atexit(Exiting'Access);
subprogram "Exited" has wrong convention
然而,提供我自己的(不兼容的(atexit
,它接受参数,然后修改Exiting
使用相同的参数,允许通过该过程来很好。
因此,问题似乎是将无参数过程作为访问类型传递。
我尝试给出
的命名访问类型type Procedure_Access is access Procedure;
但结果完全相同。
如何通过无参数过程?
您可能已经忘记了Exiting
和Procedure_Access
声明中的Convention
方面。以下在2018年GNAT CE中的作品:
foo.c
int _atexit(void (*f)(void))
{
(*f)();
return 0;
}
main.adb
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
with Interfaces.C; use Interfaces.C;
procedure Main is
type proc_ptr is access procedure
with Convention => C;
function atexit(proc : proc_ptr) return int
with Import, Convention => C, Link_Name => "_atexit";
procedure Exiting
with Convention => C;
procedure Exiting is
begin
Put_Line("Exiting");
end Exiting;
I : Integer := Integer (atexit (Exiting'Access));
begin
Put_Line("atexit returned " & I'Image);
end Main;
default.gpr
project Default is
for Source_Dirs use ("src");
for Object_Dir use "obj";
for Main use ("main.adb");
for Languages use ("Ada", "C");
end Default;
输出
Exiting
atexit returned 0