我正在使用Scala 2.10.1,我正在尝试定义一个方法,它将从对象中检索所有的值(包括继承的值)。
我有以下内容:
import scala.reflect.runtime.{universe => ru}
object Reflection {
val mirror = ru.runtimeMirror(this.getClass.getClassLoader)
def findVals(x: Any): Iterable[String] = {
val theType = mirror.classSymbol(x.getClass).toType
theType.members.collect({case x if x.isTerm => x.asTerm}).filter(_.isVal).map(_.name.toString)
}
}
我正在测试这两个类:
class Base {
val x = 10
}
class Child extends Base {
val y = 20
}
调用以下代码时:
val x = new Child
val vs = Reflection.findVals(x)
println(vs)
结果是List(y)
由于某种原因,isVal
方法为Base
类的x
字段对应的项返回false
。
Per为什么Scala的case类字段不反映为public?你应该使用isAccessor
而不是isVal
。
我实际上使用isGetter
和setter
来正确过滤var
s根据您的评论:
def findVals(x: Any): Iterable[String] = {
val theType = mirror.classSymbol(x.getClass).toType
val xtm = theType.members.collect({case x if x.isTerm => x.asTerm})
xtm.filter(m => m.isGetter && !xtm.exists(m.setter == _)).map(_.name.toString)
}
结果:
scala> class Base {
| var x = 10
| val xx = 2
| }
defined class Base
scala> class Child extends Base {
| val y = 3
| }
defined class Child
scala> val x = new Child
x: Child = Child@1c0026e
scala> val vs = Reflection.findVals(x)
vs: Iterable[String] = List(y, xx)
scala> println(vs)
List(y, xx)
Using mirror:
scala> implicit val mirror = scala.reflect.runtime.currentMirror
mirror: reflect.runtime.universe.Mirror = JavaMirror with scala.tool…
scala> import net.fwbrasil.smirror._
import net.fwbrasil.smirror._
scala> class Base {
val x = 10
}
defined class Base
scala> class Child extends Base {
val y = 20
}
defined class Child
scala> val x = new Child
x: Child = Child@448593d0
scala> x.reflect.vals
res5: List[net.fwbrasil.smirror.SInstanceVal[Child]] = List(val x: scala.Int (bound to Child@448593d0), val y: scala.Int (bound to Child@448593d0))
scala> x.reflect.vals.head.get
res7: Any = 10
所以,这是非常不优雅的,但它似乎工作:
import scala.reflect.runtime.{universe => ru}
object Reflection {
val mirror = ru.runtimeMirror(this.getClass.getClassLoader)
val ObjectClass = classOf[java.lang.Object];
def findVals(x: Any) : Iterable[String] = findVals( x.getClass, List.empty );
def findVals(clz: Class[_], accum : Iterable[String]): Iterable[String] = {
clz match {
case ObjectClass => accum;
case _ => {
val theType = mirror.classSymbol(clz).toType
val newVals = theType.members.collect({case x if x.isTerm => x.asTerm}).filter(_.isVal).map(_.name.toString)
findVals( clz.getSuperclass, accum ++ newVals )
}
}
}
}
然后……
scala> class Base {
| val x = 10
| var z = 20
| }
defined class Base
scala> class Child extends Base {
| val y = 20
| var a = 9
| }
defined class Child
scala> val x = new Child
x: Child = Child@3093266d
scala> val vs = Reflection.findVals(x)
vs: Iterable[String] = List("y ", "x ")
scala> println(vs)
List(y , x )
看起来,至少现在,Scala反射查看Java字段来确定val的存在,所以我猜你只需要爬上类层次结构…我猜它会寻找setter的存在来区分val和var,同样,不是很可爱,但是很实用。