f :: Int -> [[Int]] -> [[Int]]
f n acc = ([length $ head acc] ++ (take n $ repeat n)) : acc
我试图了解如何
take 2 $ foldr f undefined [0..]
给
[[2],[3,1]]
我能够变身到这里,然后陷入困境
foldr f undefined [0..]
foldr f undefined ([0:[1..])
f 0 $ foldr f undefined [1..]
f 0 $ foldr f undefined (1: [2..])
f 0 $ f 1 $ foldr f undefined [2..]
f 0 $ f 1 $
如果你只展开foldr
调用,你永远不会看到任何有趣的东西。一旦对f
的调用成为表达式的头部,请改为展开f
。该扩展将需要来自其acc
的一定数量的信息,这是尾随foldr
调用,但它不需要全部信息,因此您将能够取得进展。
...
f 0 $
([length $ head (foldr f undefined [1..])] ++ (take 0 $ repeat 0)) : foldr f undefined [1..]
...
在这里,我重复了两次foldr f undefined [1..]
,因为acc
被使用了两次,但当然你只需要扩展它一次,在两个地方使用相同的结果。
从 f 0 $ f 1 $ foldr f undefined [2..]
开始,再继续一次迭代,然后简单地内联f
的定义:
f 0 $ f 1 $ foldr f undefined [2..]
f 0 $ f 1 $ f 2 $ foldr f undefined [3..] -- below let rest = foldr f undefined [3..]
f 0 $ f 1 $ f 2 $ rest
f 0 $ f 1 $ (n acc -> ([length $ head acc] ++ (take n $ repeat n)) : acc) 2 $ rest
f 0 $ f 1 $ (([length $ head rest] ++ (take 2 $ repeat 2)) : rest)
f 0 $ f 1 $ (([length $ head rest] ++ [2,2]) : rest)
f 0 $ f 1 $ ([length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
f 0 $ (n acc -> ([length $ head acc] ++ (take n $ repeat n)) : acc) 1 $ ([length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
f 0 $ (([length $ head ([length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)] ++ (take 1 $ repeat 1)) : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
f 0 $ (([length $ [length $ head rest,2,2]] ++ [1]) : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
-- this is the crux, we don't need to evaluate rest to evaluate the length here
f 0 $ (([3] ++ [1]) : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
f 0 $ ([3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
((n acc -> ([length $ head acc] ++ (take n $ repeat n)) : acc) 0 $ ([3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)
([length $ head ([3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest)] ++ (take 0 $ repeat 0)) : [3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest
([length $ [3,1]] ++ []) : [3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest
[length $ [3,1]] : [3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest
[2] : [3,1] : [length $ head rest,2,2] : rest
现在由于我们只想要前两个元素(take 2
),我们得到
[[2],[3,1]]