我想知道在产品中进行审查的正确架构是什么。我看到了两个不同的建议:
我检查过的网站少将使用此结构:
"review": {
"@type": "Review",
"author": "Daniela",
"datePublished": "2016-11-01",
"description": "Fantastic product! It really helped me. I would recommend to all my friends and family.",
"name": "Awesome!",
"reviewRating": {
"@type": "Rating",
"bestRating": "5",
"ratingValue": "5",
"worstRating": "1"
}
}
并且在结构化数据测试工具中已正确验证。
但是结构化数据助手和文档显示了这种格式:
"review" : {
"@type" : "Review",
"author" : {
"@type" : "Person",
"name" : "Daniela"
},
"datePublished" : "2017-06-08",
"reviewRating" : {
"@type" : "Rating",
"ratingValue" : "5",
"bestRating" : "5",
"worstRating" : "0"
},
"reviewBody" : "Fantastic product! It really helped me. I would recommend to all my friends and family. "
}
它们是相似的,唯一很大的区别是description
与reviewBody
。
哪个是正确的?
它们是不同的属性:
-
description
给出了(通常简短的(描述/摘要/评论 -
reviewBody
给出完整的评论
没有理由在这里只选择一个。如果您都有两者的数据,则可以使用这两个属性。
对于Google的评论丰富的结果,只需检查文档:
- 对于"评论评论",需要
description
- 对于"评论片段",建议使用
reviewBody