好吧,似乎有些奇怪的事情发生了。当我以交互方式运行history -r
时,它按预期工作:
$ printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist # Make a test history file with timestamp information.
$ history -r /tmp/hist # Read it into the current history.
$ history 3 # Bash has interpreted the history comment character such that timestamps don't appear on their own line.
220 2014-06-05Thu17:59:55 history -r /tmp/hist # Read it into the current history.
221 2014-06-05Thu00:32:44 echo
222 2014-06-05Thu18:00:07 history 3 # Bash has interpreted the history comment character such that timestamps don't appear on their own line.
然而,从我的.bashrc
运行它没有相同的预期行为:
$ printf %b 'history -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc # Make a test bashrc file.
$ bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc # Run Bash with the test bashrc file; doesn't interpret the history comment character and prints a line containing ‘#1401928364’.
1 #1401928364
2 echo
我可以在Freenode上用shbot来确认:
17:29:45 <JamesJRH> # printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; history -r /tmp/hist; history 3
17:29:47 <shbot> 1 printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; history -r /tmp/hist; history 3
17:29:47 <shbot> 2 echo
17:29:49 <JamesJRH> # printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'history -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
17:29:55 <shbot> 1 #1401928364
17:29:55 <shbot> 2 echo
这是怎么回事?;我怎么能让它从我的.bashrc
文件正常工作?
更新:
With my shell:
$ echo "$BASH_VERSION"; printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'export HISTTIMEFORMAT=x27%F%a%T x27nhistory -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
4.2.45(1)-release
1 2014-06-05Thu19:42:31 #1401928364
2 2014-06-05Thu19:42:31 echo
Summary interactive bashrc
without HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Fails.
with HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Fails.
与<<p> em> shbot : 19:45:29 <JamesJRH> # echo "$BASH_VERSION"; printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'export HISTTIMEFORMAT=x27%F%a%T x27nhistory -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
19:45:36 <shbot> 4.3.18(1)-release
19:45:36 <shbot> 1 2014-06-05Thu00:32:44 echo
19:45:49 <JamesJRH> 42# echo "$BASH_VERSION"; printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'export HISTTIMEFORMAT=x27%F%a%T x27nhistory -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
19:45:56 <shbot> 4.2.47(2)-release
19:45:56 <shbot> 1 2014-06-05Thu00:32:44 echo
19:46:08 <JamesJRH> 41# echo "$BASH_VERSION"; printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'export HISTTIMEFORMAT=x27%F%a%T x27nhistory -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
19:46:15 <shbot> 4.1.11(1)-release
19:46:15 <shbot> 1 2014-06-05Thu00:32:44 echo
Summary interactive bashrc
without HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Fails.
with HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Succeeds.
那么是什么导致了Bash和shbot之间的差异呢? 设置HISTTIMEFORMAT
环境是否有效?变量,然后再运行历史记录?
export HISTTIMEFORMAT="%F %T "
如果未设置HISTTIMEFORMAT
,则不将时间戳写入历史文件。
唉!!
我终于确定了我的shell和shbot的区别,它确实是Bash 版本,正如我最初怀疑的那样,但是shbot欺骗了我!实际上,这是由于shbot的实现细节,但是我的命令的这个变体给出了哪些版本工作或不工作的真实故事:
03:31:11 <JamesJRH> # printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'echo "$BASH_VERSION"nexport HISTTIMEFORMAT=x27%F%a%T x27nhistory -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
03:31:18 <shbot> 4.3.18(1)-release
03:31:18 <shbot> 1 2014-06-05Thu00:32:44 echo
03:31:25 <JamesJRH> # printf %b '#1401928364nechon' > /tmp/hist; printf %b 'echo "$BASH_VERSION"nexport HISTTIMEFORMAT=x27%F%a%T x27nhistory -r /tmp/histnhistory 3n' > /tmp/bashrc; bash42 --rcfile /tmp/bashrc
03:31:32 <shbot> 4.2.47(2)-release
03:31:32 <shbot> 1 2014-06-06Fri03:31:24 #1401928364
03:31:32 <shbot> 2 2014-06-06Fri03:31:24 echo
所以现在摘要指向版本!
使用Bash 4.2及更早版本:
Summary interactive bashrc
without HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Fails.
with HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Fails.*
* 4.2.47测试(2)释放,4.2.45(1)释放,4.2.25(1)释放,4.2.8(1)释放,4.1.11(1)释放,4.0.38(1)释放,3.2.51(2)释放,3.2.39(1)释放。
从Bash 4.3开始:
Summary interactive bashrc
without HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Fails.
with HISTTIMEFORMAT Succeeds. Succeeds.*
*测试4.3.18(1)-释放。
仍然不完全确定为什么HISTTIMEFORMAT
不需要交互,但在.bashrc
中需要,但这不是问题。
因此,对这个问题的直接回答是:只有当使用的Bash版本至少为4.3并且HISTTIMEFORMAT
变量被设置且不为空时,才会从.bashrc
解释它们。在我的情况下,HISTTIMEFORMAT
已经在我的.bashrc
中设置了,所以这是版本的问题。很明显这是一个bug,这个bug已经被修复了。
现在需要去安装Bash 4.3…:-)