在几年前编写的一个网络服务器项目中,我偶尔会得到一个非常奇怪且在我眼中不可能NullPointerException
。 它发生在用于在控制台上记录输出的实用程序方法中。
这是该方法的错误摘录:
try {
Encoder encoder = Base64.getEncoder();
if(logWriter != null) {
logWriter.write(String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis()));
logWriter.write(" ");
logWriter.write(String.valueOf(level));
logWriter.write(" ");
logWriter.write(encoder.encodeToString(Thread.currentThread().getName().getBytes()).replaceAll("(?:\r\n|\n\r|\n|\r)", ""));
logWriter.write(" ");
logWriter.write(encoder.encodeToString(log.getBytes()).replaceAll("(?:\r\n|\n\r|\n|\r)", ""));
logWriter.write("rn");
logWriter.flush();
}
lastWriterActivity = System.currentTimeMillis();
} catch (IOException e) {
println("Failed to write log to file: " + e, Color.RED);
try {
logWriter.close();
} catch (IOException e1) {
println("### Possible resource leak; unable to close log writer", Color.RED);
}
logWriter = null;
}
其中logWriter
是BufferedWriter
.NPE 在调用logWriter.close()
的第一个catch
块中抛出。
但是:当我的 logWriter!= null
时,如何将IOException
扔进我的try
块中?Base64.getEncoder()
不能抛出IOException
,也没有其他代码要执行。
这是我的堆栈跟踪:
Exception in thread "connection_0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1@1544725509" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.jpuzzle.main.Logger.write(Logger.java:347)
at org.jpuzzle.main.Logger.verbose(Logger.java:187)
at org.jpuzzle.protocol.http.HttpRequest.onRequest(HttpRequest.java:1090)
at org.jpuzzle.network.ConnectionListener$Connection.proceed(ConnectionListener.java:438)
at org.jpuzzle.network.ConnectionListener$Connection.run(ConnectionListener.java:408)
我的方法synchronized
,所以相互排斥应该不会有任何困难,我不知道为什么会发生这种情况。
简短回答:
重写catch
块以避免NullPointerException
try {
if(logWriter != null) {
logWriter.close();
}
} catch (IOException e1) {
println("### Possible resource leak; unable to close log writer", Color.RED);
}
长答案:
是的,logWriter是静态的。 同步不会阻止方法的平行方法执行吗?
不。
需要证明吗?
运行以下代码:
public class NowImFeelingZombified {
static Object logWriter = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
final NowImFeelingZombified zombie1 = new NowImFeelingZombified();
final NowImFeelingZombified zombie2 = new NowImFeelingZombified();
Thread t1 = new Thread("zombie1 ") {
@Override
public void run() {
zombie1.syncedMethod();
}
};
Thread t2 = new Thread("zombie2 ") {
@Override
public void run() {
zombie2.syncedMethod();
}
};
t1.start();
t2.start();
}
private synchronized void syncedMethod() {
try {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + logWriter.toString());
Thread.sleep(2000L);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + logWriter.toString());
logWriter = null;
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
}
输出如下所示:
zombie1 java.lang.Object@1c34796b
zombie2 java.lang.Object@1c34796b
zombie1 java.lang.Object@1c34796b
Exception in thread "zombie2 " java.lang.NullPointerException
at NowImFeelingZombified.syncedMethod(NowImFeelingZombified.java:44)
豪萨?
同步方法会获取方法调用方的锁。这意味着t1
不在乎t2
(当然也不关心logWriter
(。
就是这样。阅读此处了解完整故事。
此外,很久以前,我为我一直使用的 Util 类编写了这样的 5 行代码。它使我免于编写用于关闭Closeables
的catch
块
public static void close(Closeable closeable) {
if (closeable != null) {
try {
closeable.close();
}
catch (IOException e) {
//logging
}
}
}
无论如何,Java 1.7引入了您可能想要探索的AutoCloseable
(由BufferedWriter
实现(。