我具有以下数据库:
select * from (
values ('A', 1, 2), ('A', 2, 3), ('A', 3, 4),
('B', 4, 5), ('B', 5, 6), ('A', 6, 7),
('C', 7, 8), ('C', 8, 9)
) example_table("state", "start", "end")
-- example table:
-- state start stop
-- A t1 t2
-- A t2 t3
-- A t3 t4
-- B t4 t5
-- B t5 t6
-- A t6 t7
-- C t7 t8
-- C t8 t9
我想通过 state
折叠间隔,同时也尊重中间状态开关:
state start stop
A t1 t4
B t4 t6
A t6 t7
C t7 t9
仅使用group by state
无法使用,因为给定的state
的输出中有多个行。
这似乎是窗口函数的用例,但是我不确定该行如何分区。
我想创建一个group_id
,就像以下作为中间步骤:
group state start stop
1 A t1 t2
1 A t2 t3
1 A t3 t4
2 B t4 t5
2 B t5 t6
3 A t6 t7
4 C t7 t8
4 C t8 t9
我可以按group
进行分组,然后选择min(start)
和max(stop)
,但我不知道如何(有效地)创建此变量。在r中,我会使用 rle
函数来做到这一点,但我不知道任何presto等效。
此答案已更新以反映以下成功的答案
with example_table("state", "start", "end") as (
values ('A', 1, 2), ('A', 2, 3), ('A', 3, 4),
('B', 4, 5), ('B', 5, 6), ('A', 6, 7),
('C', 7, 8), ('C', 8, 9)
), table_with_lags as (
-- detect state changes by observing the lagged value
select *, lag(state) over(order by start) as lag_state,
-- need to track the final value since it may be lost below
last_value("end") over(order by start rows between
0 preceding and unbounded following)
as end_period
from example_table
)
select state, start,
-- force-re-establish the start(+1) = end(0) link;
-- at the end of the period, override this with the
-- final observed value instead of null
lead(start, 1, end_period) over(order by start) as "end"
from table_with_lags
-- lag_state will be null for the first row
where state <> lag_state or lag_state is null
order by start
输出:
state start stop
A 1 4
B 4 6
A 6 7
C 7 9
rows between 0 preceding and unbounded following
位有点冗长,因此您也可以翻转逻辑并做:
table_with_leads as (
select state, start, "end",
lead(state) over(order by start) as lead_state,
first_value(start) over(order by start) as start_period
from example_table
)
select state, lag("end", 1, start_period) over(order by start) as start, "end"
from table_with_lags
where state <> lead_state or lead_state is null
order by start
原始答案
以下工作,但不是大规模的表现(即使在数据的10%子样本上,我也会得到"超过本地内存限制"错误):
with switches as (
-- coalesce since the first row will be NULL, need it false
select *, coalesce(state <> lag(state) over(order by start), false) switched
from (
values ('A', 1, 2), ('A', 2, 3), ('A', 3, 4),
('B', 4, 5), ('B', 5, 6), ('A', 6, 7),
('C', 7, 8), ('C', 8, 9)
) example_table("state", "start", "stop")
), groups as (
-- create the group ID as the accumulation of the state switches
-- since only one state switch can happen per group
select *, sum(cast(switched as bigint)) over (order by start) group_id
from switches
)
select min(state) state, min(start) start, max(stop) stop
from groups group by group_id order by start;
-- state start stop
-- A 1 4
-- B 4 6
-- A 6 7
-- C 7 9
i 目前通过将groups
暂时存储为表格,然后从groups
分别将select
置于表格中,这似乎是在RAM问题上遇到的(对我来说,有点令人惊讶)。这似乎并不理想,但是随着工作完成,我现在很满足于此。