python popen stdout freezing



我已经阅读了许多涉及实时标准输出打印的问题,包括J.F. Sebastian的Python 3解决方案的答案 阅读标准输出。

但是,虽然他的解决方案在这种情况下有效:

with Popen(['ping'] + ['169.254.79.191'] + ['-c'] + ['5'], stdout=PIPE, bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True) as p:
for line in p.stdout:
print(line, end='')

它不能像我实际想要使用的应用程序那样工作:

with Popen(['iperf3', '-c', '169.254.79.191', 'b', '100000000', '-p', '5202', 't', '5', '-R', '-V', '-u'], stdout=PIPE, bufsize=1, universal_newlines=True) as p:
for line in p.stdout:
print(line, end='')

对于 ping 方案,每行都打印出来,就好像我手动运行它一样。使用 iperf,它会在两行输出后停止,并在应用程序完成后刷新所有内容。 如果我在脚本中相互执行它们,我会得到以下输出:

pi@raspberrypi2:~/project $ python3.4 stdout_RT_test.py
PING 169.254.79.191 (169.254.79.191) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 169.254.79.191: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.854 ms
64 bytes from 169.254.79.191: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.867 ms
64 bytes from 169.254.79.191: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.877 ms
64 bytes from 169.254.79.191: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.842 ms
64 bytes from 169.254.79.191: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.834 ms
--- 169.254.79.191 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.834/0.854/0.877/0.040 ms
iperf 3.0.7
Linux raspberrypi2 4.4.50-v7+ #970 SMP Mon Feb 20 19:18:29 GMT 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux

此行之后的所有内容在 IPERF 完成后显示

Time: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:46:48 GMT
Connecting to host 169.254.79.191, port 5202
Reverse mode, remote host 169.254.79.191 is sending
Cookie: raspberrypi2.1490798808.947399.0490a
[  4] local 169.254.181.167 port 41415 connected to 169.254.79.191 port 5202
Starting Test: protocol: UDP, 1 streams, 8192 byte blocks, omitting 0 seconds, 10 second test
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   136 KBytes  1.11 Mbits/sec  1.907 ms  0/17 (0%)
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.966 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.634 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.522 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.466 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.456 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.452 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.447 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.451 ms  0/16 (0%)
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec   128 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec  0.460 ms  0/16 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Test Complete. Summary Results:
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.26 MBytes  1.06 Mbits/sec  0.460 ms  0/161 (0%)
[  4] Sent 161 datagrams
CPU Utilization: local/receiver 0.5% (0.0%u/0.5%s), remote/sender 0.0% (0.0%u/0.0%s)
iperf Done.

在"间隔"列中可以看出,如果我手动运行相同的命令,每秒打印大约一行。我是python的新手,所以任何错误都是可能的。我已经尝试了其他几种缓存标准输出的方法,但它们也会像这样冻结输出。这能以某种方式解决吗?

BR 安德烈亚斯

编辑:我想到问题是iperf不刷新,但由于它显然每秒写一个新行,因此必须有一种方法可以在刷新之前捕获它。当运行较长的测试时,我注意到 stdout 缓冲区最终已达到最大值,并且会刷新许多行并继续直到它再次充满。

尝试将--forceflush命令行标志转换为 iperf3。 这会导致 iperf3 在每行输出后刷新其输出。

您还可以使用以下方法更改缓冲区值:

stdbuf -i0 -o0 -e0 iperf3 ...

相关内容

  • 没有找到相关文章

最新更新