转换后的json结果结构与源不相同

Question

我有测试用例要与Kafka消息中保存的源进行比较。

我注意到结构不一样。

没有遗漏字段，但结构没有按相同的顺序排列。

如何使转换后的结果与源结构相同？

检索消息的代码，然后解码base64格式并预打印结果。

def responseList = new JsonSlurper().parseText(consumeMessage.getResponseText())
println('response text: n' + JsonOutput.prettyPrint(JsonOutput.toJson(responseList)))
def decoded = new JsonSlurper().parseText(new String(responseList[0].value.decodeBase64()))
println('response decoded text: n' + JsonOutput.prettyPrint(JsonOutput.toJson(decoded)))

下面是控制台打印的结果

2019-11-20 16:36:44.934 DEBUG oingDRToAllocationVerification-DynamicID - 10: decoded = JsonSlurper().parseText(new java.lang.String(responseList[0].value.decodeBase64()))
2019-11-20 16:36:44.945 DEBUG oingDRToAllocationVerification-DynamicID - 11: println("response decoded text: 
" + JsonOutput.prettyPrint(JsonOutput.toJson(decoded)))
response decoded text: 
{
"contexts": [
{
"activityId": "c2884e63-d30d-48a3-965c-0b33202885c2",
"incomingTimestamp": "2019-11-20T08:36:29.0829958Z",
"sourceName": "DispenseOrderService",
"timestamp": "2019-11-20T08:36:29.0829958+00:00",
"userId": "unknown"
}
],
"dispenseOrder": [
{
"dispenseRequestType": "DISPENSEORDER",
"id": "6320112019043628",
"items": [
{
"administrationInstructions": "drug intake information test 123",
"dispenseAsWritten": false,
"id": "cda92ec7-3191-4b7b-a972-7f4545146db4",
"itemId": "Augmentn",
"quantity": 100
},
{
"administrationInstructions": "drug intake information test 234",
"dispenseAsWritten": false,
"id": "19e00776-b08d-47c8-930b-76ddc01f0ff4",
"itemId": "Clopidogrl",
"quantity": 200
},
{
"administrationInstructions": "drug intake information test 456",
"dispenseAsWritten": true,
"id": "0a5b0f4a-366d-4fa7-a0b8-2e8c83f4af13",
"itemId": "Adenosine",
"quantity": 300
}
],
"locationId": "Pharmacy Jewel East",
"piiIdentifiers": {
"doctorId": "b502f046-fb1e-4fcf-8135-a7a13cfb47f6",
"patientId": "fe49b461-8eeb-46d5-b995-a31cdaaa35f3",
"pharmacistId": "b502f046-fb1e-4fcf-8135-a7a13cfb47f6"
},
"priority": 4,
"state": "NEW",
"type": "Test ingest type"
}
],
"messageClass": "DispenseRequestV1",
"messageId": "83e94dac-dfb6-49d7-8ca0-219d155fecce",
"notifications": [

],
"operation": "Add",
"timestamp": "2019-11-20T08:36:29.0952632+00:00"
}

以下是来源。转换后的结果与源不相同。因为在结构中没有相应地布置。

{
"operation" : "Add",
"dispenseOrder" : [ {
"id" : "6320112019043628",
"locationId" : "Pharmacy Jewel East",
"piiIdentifiers" : {
"patientId" : "fe49b461-8eeb-46d5-b995-a31cdaaa35f3",
"doctorId" : "b502f046-fb1e-4fcf-8135-a7a13cfb47f6",
"pharmacistId" : "b502f046-fb1e-4fcf-8135-a7a13cfb47f6"
},
"priority" : 4,
"state" : "NEW",
"type" : "Test ingest type",
"dispenseRequestType" : "DISPENSEORDER",
"items" : [ {
"id" : "cda92ec7-3191-4b7b-a972-7f4545146db4",
"itemId" : "Augmentn",
"quantity" : 100,
"dispenseAsWritten" : false,
"administrationInstructions" : "drug intake information test 123"
}, {
"id" : "19e00776-b08d-47c8-930b-76ddc01f0ff4",
"itemId" : "Clopidogrl",
"quantity" : 200,
"dispenseAsWritten" : false,
"administrationInstructions" : "drug intake information test 234"
}, {
"id" : "0a5b0f4a-366d-4fa7-a0b8-2e8c83f4af13",
"itemId" : "Adenosine",
"quantity" : 300,
"dispenseAsWritten" : true,
"administrationInstructions" : "drug intake information test 456"
} ]
} ],
"messageId" : "83e94dac-dfb6-49d7-8ca0-219d155fecce",
"timestamp" : "2019-11-20T08:36:29.0952632+00:00",
"messageClass" : "DispenseRequestV1",
"contexts" : [ {
"userId" : "unknown",
"timestamp" : "2019-11-20T08:36:29.0829958+00:00",
"activityId" : "c2884e63-d30d-48a3-965c-0b33202885c2",
"incomingTimestamp" : "2019-11-20T08:36:29.0829958Z",
"sourceName" : "DispenseOrderService"
} ],
"notifications" : [ ]
}

Answer 1

正如json.org所说：

对象是一组无序的名称/值对。

因此，不同的JSON方法/库可能会以不同的方式对它们进行排序。使用JSON时，不应该依赖名称/值对的顺序。

(如果订单对你来说非常重要，你可以尝试使用这篇文章中的建议解决方案。(