我想(超级)优化Heaviside函数的实现。
我正在研究一种数值算法(在Fortran中),其中速度特别重要。这多次使用 Heaviside 函数,目前由 signum 内函数实现,如下所示:
heaviside = 0.5*sign(1,x)+1
我主要对 x 是英特尔处理器上的双精度实数的情况感兴趣。
是否有可能开发更有效的Heaviside函数实现?也许使用汇编语言、超级优化代码或调用现有的外部库?
你打算heaviside = 0.5*(sign(1,x)+1)
吗?无论如何,使用 gcc 4.8.1 fortran 进行测试表明,高性能 Mark 的想法应该是有益的。这里有3种可能性:
重赛德1 - 原装heaviside2 - 高性能马克的想法Heaviside3 - 另一种变体
function heaviside1 (x)
double precision heaviside1, x
heaviside1 = 0.5 * (sign(1d0,x) + 1)
end
function heaviside2 (x)
double precision heaviside2, x
heaviside2 = sign(0.5d0,x) + 0.5
end
function heaviside3 (x)
double precision heaviside3, x
heaviside3 = 0
if (x .ge. 0) heaviside3 = 1
end
program demo
double precision heaviside1, heaviside2, heaviside3, x, a, b, c
do
x = 0.5 - RAND(0)
a = heaviside1(x)
b = heaviside2(x)
c = heaviside3(x)
print *, "x=", x, "heaviside(x)=", a, b, c
enddo
end
编译时,gcc 生成以下 3 个独立函数:
<heaviside1_>:
vmovsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rcx]
vandpd xmm0,xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rip+0x2d824]
vorpd xmm0,xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rip+0x2d80c]
vaddsd xmm0,xmm0,QWORD PTR [rip+0x2d7f4]
vmulsd xmm0,xmm0,QWORD PTR [rip+0x2d81c]
ret
<heaviside2_>:
vmovsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rcx]
vandpd xmm0,xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rip+0x2d844]
vorpd xmm0,xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rip+0x2d85c]
vaddsd xmm0,xmm0,QWORD PTR [rip+0x2d844]
ret
<heaviside3_>:
vxorpd xmm0,xmm0,xmm0
vmovsd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x2d844]
vcmplesd xmm0,xmm0,QWORD PTR [rcx]
vandpd xmm0,xmm1,xmm0
ret
当使用 gcc 编译时,heaviside1 会生成一个可能会减慢执行速度的乘法。Heaviside2消除了乘法。Heaviside3 的指令数与 Heaviside2 相同,但使用的内存访问次数少 2 次。
对于独立功能:
instruction memory reference
count count
heaviside1 6 5
heaviside2 5 4
heaviside3 5 2
这些函数的内联代码避免了对返回指令的需要,理想情况下,在寄存器中传递参数,并使用所需的常量预加载其他寄存器。确切的结果取决于所使用的编译器和调用代码。内联代码的估计值:
instruction memory reference
count count
heaviside1 4 0
heaviside2 3 0
heaviside3 2 0
看起来该函数可以通过两个编译器生成的指令来处理:vcmplesd+vandpd。如果参数为负数,则第一条指令创建所有零的掩码,否则创建所有 1 的掩码。第二条指令将掩码应用于寄存器常量值 1,以产生 0 或 1 的结果值。
虽然我没有对这些函数进行基准测试,但看起来 heaviside 函数应该不会花费太多执行时间。
---09/23/2013:添加x86_64汇编语言版本和C语言基准测试---
文件函数。
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.intel_syntax noprefix
.text
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// this heaviside function generates its own register constants
// double heaviside_a1 (double arg);
.globl heaviside_a1
heaviside_a1:
mov rax,0x3ff0000000000000
xorpd xmm1,xmm1 # xmm1: constant 0.0
cmplesd xmm1,xmm0 # xmm1: mask (all Fs or all 0s)
movq xmm0,rax # xmm0: constant 1.0
andpd xmm0,xmm1
retq
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// this heaviside function uses register constants passed from caller
// double heaviside_a2 (double arg, double const0, double const1);
.globl heaviside_a2
heaviside_a2:
cmplesd xmm1,xmm0 # xmm1: mask (all Fs or all 0s)
movsd xmm0,xmm2 # xmm0: constant 1.0
andpd xmm0,xmm1
retq
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
文件 ctest.c
#define __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO 1
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
// functions.s
double heaviside_a1 (double x);
double heaviside_a2 (double arg, double const0, double const1);
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
static double heaviside_c1 (double x)
{
double result = 0;
if (x >= 0) result = 1;
return result;
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
//
// queryPerformanceCounter - similar to QueryPerformanceCounter, but returns
// count directly.
uint64_t queryPerformanceCounter (void)
{
LARGE_INTEGER int64;
QueryPerformanceCounter (&int64);
return int64.QuadPart;
}
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
//
// queryPerformanceFrequency - same as QueryPerformanceFrequency, but returns count direcly.
uint64_t queryPerformanceFrequency (void)
{
LARGE_INTEGER int64;
QueryPerformanceFrequency (&int64);
return int64.QuadPart;
}
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------
//
// lfsr64gpr - left shift galois type lfsr for 64-bit data, general purpose register implementation
//
static uint64_t lfsr64gpr (uint64_t data, uint64_t mask)
{
uint64_t carryOut = data >> 63;
uint64_t maskOrZ = -carryOut;
return (data << 1) ^ (maskOrZ & mask);
}
//---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int runtests (uint64_t pattern, uint64_t mask)
{
uint64_t startCount, elapsed, index, loops = 800000000;
double ns;
double total = 0;
startCount = queryPerformanceCounter ();
for (index = 0; index < loops; index++)
{
double x, result;
pattern = lfsr64gpr (pattern, mask);
x = (double) (int64_t) pattern;
result = heaviside_c1 (x);
total += result;
}
elapsed = queryPerformanceCounter () - startCount;
ns = (double) elapsed / queryPerformanceFrequency () * 1000000000 / loops;
printf ("heaviside_c1: %7.2f nsn", ns);
startCount = queryPerformanceCounter ();
for (index = 0; index < loops; index++)
{
double x, result;
pattern = lfsr64gpr (pattern, mask);
x = (double) (int64_t) pattern;
result = heaviside_a1 (x);
//printf ("heaviside_a1 (%lf): %lfn", x, result);
total += result;
}
elapsed = queryPerformanceCounter () - startCount;
ns = (double) elapsed / queryPerformanceFrequency () * 1000000000 / loops;
printf ("heaviside_a1: %7.2f nsn", ns);
startCount = queryPerformanceCounter ();
for (index = 0; index < loops; index++)
{
double x, result;
const double const0 = 0.0;
const double const1 = 1.0;
pattern = lfsr64gpr (pattern, mask);
x = (double) (int64_t) pattern;
result = heaviside_a2 (x, const0, const1);
//printf ("heaviside_a2 (%lf): %lfn", x, result);
total += result;
}
elapsed = queryPerformanceCounter () - startCount;
ns = (double) elapsed / queryPerformanceFrequency () * 1000000000 / loops;
printf ("heaviside_a2: %7.2f nsn", ns);
return total;
}
//---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int main (void)
{
uint64_t mask;
mask = 0xBEFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
// raise our priority to increase measurement accuracy
SetPriorityClass (GetCurrentProcess (), REALTIME_PRIORITY_CLASS);
printf ("using pseudo-random datan");
runtests (1, mask);
return 0;
}
//---------------------------------------------------------------------------
mingw64 build command: gcc -Wall -Wextra -O3 -octest.exe ctest.c functions.s
英特尔酷睿 i7-2600K 在 4.0 GHz 时的程序输出:
using pseudo-random data
heaviside_c1: 2.24 ns
heaviside_a1: 2.00 ns
heaviside_a2: 2.00 ns
这些计时结果包括执行伪随机参数生成和结果累加代码,以防止优化程序消除否则未使用的heaviside_c1局部函数。
heaviside_c1来自最初的 fortran 建议,移植到 C。heaviside_a1是一种汇编语言实现。heaviside_a2是对汇编语言版本的修改,它使用调用方传递的寄存器常量来避免生成它们的开销。对于我的处理器,基准测试显示传递常量没有任何优势。
汇编语言函数假定 xmm0 返回结果,xmm1 和 xmm2 可用作暂存寄存器。这对 Windows 使用的 x64 调用约定有效。对于其他调用约定,应确认此假设。
为了避免内存访问,汇编语言版本期望参数按寄存器 (XMM0) 中的值传递。由于这不是 fortran 默认值,因此需要特殊声明。这个似乎适用于 gfortran 64 位:
interface
real(c_double) function heaviside_a1(x)
use iso_c_binding, only: c_double
real(c_double), VALUE :: x
end function heaviside_a1
end interface