在rspec测试中使用eq
和eql
有什么区别?
it "adds the correct information to entries" do
# book = AddressBook.new # => Replaced by line 4
book.add_entry('Ada Lovelace', '010.012.1815', 'augusta.king@lovelace.com')
new_entry = book.entries[0]
expect(new_entry.name).to eq('Ada Lovelace')
expect(new_entry.phone_number).to eq('010.012.1815')
expect(new_entry.email).to eq('augusta.king@lovelace.com')
end
:
it "adds the correct information to entries" do
# book = AddressBook.new # => Replaced by line 4
book.add_entry('Ada Lovelace', '010.012.1815', 'augusta.king@lovelace.com')
new_entry = book.entries[0]
expect(new_entry.name).to eql('Ada Lovelace')
expect(new_entry.phone_number).to eql('010.012.1815')
expect(new_entry.email).to eql('augusta.king@lovelace.com')
end
根据在比较中使用的相等类型,这里有细微的区别。
From the Rpsec docs:
Ruby exposes several different methods for handling equality:
a.equal?(b) # object identity - a and b refer to the same object
a.eql?(b) # object equivalence - a and b have the same value
a == b # object equivalence - a and b have the same value with type conversions]
eq
使用==
运算符进行比较,eql
忽略类型转换。
差别很细微。eq
与==
的ruby实现相同。另一方面,eql
与eql?
的ruby实现相同。
eq
检查对象的等价性,并进行类型强制转换,将不同的对象转换为相同的类型。
如果两个对象属于同一类并且具有相同的值,则它们是等效的,但它们在内存中不一定是相同的对象。
expect(:my_symbol).to eq(:my_symbol)
# passes, both are identical.
expect('my string').to eq('my string')
# passes, objects are equivalent
expect(5).to eq(5.0)
# passes, Objects are not equivalent but was type cast to same object type.
eql
检查对象等价性,不尝试类型转换。
expect(:my_symbol).to eql(:my_symbol)
# passes, both are identical.
expect('my string').to eql('my string')
# passes, objects are equivalent but not identical
expect(5).to eql(5.0)
# fails, Objects are not equivalence, did not try to type cast
equal
检查对象身份。如果两个对象是相同的对象,即它们具有相同的对象id(在内存中共享相同的地址),则它们是相同的。
expect(:my_symbol).to equal(:my_symbol)
# passes, both are identical.
expect('my string').to equal('my string')
# fails, objects are equivalent but not identical
expect(5).to equal(5.0)
# fails, objects are not equivalent and not identical