我有一个表,它将数字余额存储在不同的桶中(桶1,桶2和桶3)。当金额在系统中发布时,金额必须分配到桶中。事务类型决定了它如何影响桶。类型1、2和3增加各自的桶(没有瀑布),而类型0使用瀑布减少桶。这意味着类型0的量首先减少桶1,然后任何剩余的减少桶2,任何剩余的减少桶3。
我目前使用游标来应用金额,该游标循环遍历每个已发布的金额。因为是瀑布,所以应用的数量顺序是关键。显然,当处理成千上万的金额时,它非常慢。我想知道是否有一种基于集合的方法来做到这一点?
生成表和记录的代码: http://pastebin.com/XgKrKkbm分配金额的游标如下:
DECLARE @Instrument int,
@Type int,
@Amount numeric(19,2),
@NewAmount numeric(19,2),
@Seq int,
@Bucket1 numeric(19,2),
@Bucket2 numeric(19,2),
@Bucket3 numeric(19,2)
DECLARE Waterfall CURSOR Fast_Forward FOR
SELECT InstrumentID, TypeID, Amount, Sequence
FROM Amount
WHERE EffectiveDate between '2015-06-20' and '2015-06-30'
ORDER BY InstrumentID, Sequence
OPEN Waterfall;
FETCH NEXT from Waterfall into @Instrument, @Type, @Amount, @Seq
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT @Bucket1 = Bucket1, @Bucket2 = Bucket2, @Bucket3 = Bucket3
FROM Buckets WHERE InstrumentID = @Instrument
IF @Type > 0 /*Increase Buckets, no waterfall*/
BEGIN
SET @Bucket1 = CASE WHEN @Type = 1 THEN @Bucket1 + @Amount ELSE @Bucket1 END
SET @Bucket2 = CASE WHEN @Type = 2 THEN @Bucket2 + @Amount ELSE @Bucket2 END
SET @Bucket3 = CASE WHEN @Type = 3 THEN @Bucket3 + @Amount ELSE @Bucket3 END
END
ELSE /*Decrease buckets with waterfall*/
BEGIN
SET @NewAmount = CASE WHEN @Amount >= @Bucket1 THEN @Amount - @Bucket1 ELSE 0 END
SET @Bucket1 = CASE WHEN @Amount >= @Bucket1 THEN 0 ELSE @Bucket1 - @Amount END
SET @Amount = @NewAmount
SET @NewAmount = CASE WHEN @Amount >= @Bucket2 THEN @Amount - @Bucket2 ELSE 0 END
SET @Bucket2 = CASE WHEN @Amount >= @Bucket2 THEN 0 ELSE @Bucket2 - @Amount END
SET @Amount = @NewAmount
SET @Bucket3 = CASE WHEN @Amount >= @Bucket3 THEN 0 ELSE @Bucket3 - @Amount END
END
/*Record effect of each amount on the balances for audit/undo*/
UPDATE Amount
SET Bucket1 = @Bucket1 - Buckets.Bucket1,
Bucket2 = @Bucket2 - Buckets.Bucket2,
Bucket3 = @Bucket3 - Buckets.Bucket3
FROM Buckets
inner join Amount
on Amount.InstrumentID = Buckets.InstrumentID
where Sequence = @Seq
/*update bucket values in table*/
UPDATE Buckets
SET Bucket1 = @Bucket1,
Bucket2 = @Bucket2,
Bucket3 = @Bucket3
WHERE InstrumentID = @Instrument
FETCH NEXT from Waterfall INTO @Instrument, @Type, @Amount, @Seq
END
CLOSE Waterfall
DEALLOCATE Waterfall
创建和插入脚本是在PasteBin,所以不会让我张贴问题时,他们被包括(文本长度?)。
关于瀑布序列的清晰度至关重要的例子:
从下面开始:
Instrument | Bucket1 | Bucket2 | Bucket 3
1 | 500 | 200 | 3000
两笔金额如下
Instrument | Sequence| Type | Amount
1 | 1 | 0 | 800 /*this decreases buckets via waterfall*/
1 | 2 | 1 | 500 /*this increases bucket 1*/
如果金额按顺序施加,则结果如下:
Instrument | Bucket1 | Bucket2 | Bucket 3
1 | 500 | 0 | 2900
然而,金额以相反的顺序应用它们,结果是不正确的:
Instrument | Bucket1 | Bucket2 | Bucket 3
1 | 200 | 200 | 3000
这就是您想要的。比CURSOR
更高效。
UPDATE
b
SET
Bucket1 = CASE WHEN a.[Type] = 1 THEN b.Bucket1 + a.Amount
WHEN a.[Type] = 0 AND Amount >= b.Bucket1 THEN 0
WHEN a.[Type] = 0 AND Amount < b.Bucket1 THEN b.Bucket1 - a.Amount
ELSE Bucket1
END,
Bucket2 = CASE WHEN a.[Type] = 2 THEN b.Bucket2 + a.Amount
WHEN a.[Type] = 0 AND Amount >= b.Bucket1 + Bucket2 THEN 0
WHEN a.[Type] = 0 AND Amount BETWEEN b.Bucket1 AND Bucket2 THEN Bucket2 - (a.Amount - b.Bucket1)
ELSE Bucket2
END,
Bucket3 = CASE WHEN a.[Type] = 3 THEN b.Bucket3 + a.Amount
WHEN a.[Type] = 0 AND Amount >= b.Bucket1 + Bucket2 THEN Bucket3 - (a.Amount - b.Bucket1 - Bucket2)
ELSE Bucket3
END
FROM
dbo.Buckets AS b
JOIN
(SELECT TOP 10000000 * FROM dbo.Amounts ORDER BY Sequence) AS a
ON b.InstrumentID = a.InstrumentID