我不明白以下代码的行为:https://gist.github.com/tomaszalusky/3e3777b4fd0c6096f3f707bb19b50b52 -参见嵌入:
import java.lang.reflect.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
public class AnnotationOnTypeArgument {
@Target({ElementType.FIELD,ElementType.PARAMETER,ElementType.METHOD,ElementType.TYPE_USE})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface Anno {
}
interface Nested<T> {
}
Toplevel<@Anno Integer> toplevel;
Nested<@Anno Integer> nested;
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
print(AnnotationOnTypeArgument.class.getDeclaredField("toplevel"));
print(AnnotationOnTypeArgument.class.getDeclaredField("nested"));
}
private static void print(Field field) {
AnnotatedType annotatedType = field.getAnnotatedType();
AnnotatedParameterizedType annotatedParameterizedType = (AnnotatedParameterizedType)annotatedType;
ParameterizedType parameterizedType = (ParameterizedType)annotatedParameterizedType.getType();
AnnotatedType argType = annotatedParameterizedType.getAnnotatedActualTypeArguments()[0];
System.out.printf("field %s%ntype=%s%nannotatedType=%s%nannotations=%s%ntype=%s%n%n",
field.getName(), parameterizedType, argType, Arrays.asList(argType.getDeclaredAnnotations()), argType.getType());
}
}
interface Toplevel<T> {
}
编辑:实际结果是:
field toplevel
type=Toplevel<java.lang.Integer>
annotatedType=sun.reflect.annotation.AnnotatedTypeFactory$AnnotatedTypeBaseImpl@1540e19d
annotations=[@AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Anno()]
type=class java.lang.Integer
field nested
type=AnnotationOnTypeArgument.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Nested<java.lang.Integer>
annotatedType=sun.reflect.annotation.AnnotatedTypeFactory$AnnotatedTypeBaseImpl@677327b6
annotations=[]
type=class java.lang.Integer
为什么当周围的类型嵌套时,类型参数上声明的注释数组是空的?我希望有一个元素,就像顶级类型一样。
如果有任何基于JLS的解释,我将不胜感激。在JDK8u101 (http://compilejava.net),旧的JDK8和Eclipse上一致发生。
谢谢!
这是OpenJDK中的一个错误,我已经报告了这个问题,我希望它能被修复。类型注释在实践中并没有真正使用得那么多,它似乎并不是一个优先事项。正如Holger所提到的,这是AnnotatedTypeFactory
实现中的一个混淆。
你可以使用Byte Buddy来正确解析类文件元数据:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
TypeDescription type = TypePool.Default.ofClassPath()
.describe(AnnotationOnTypeArgument.class.getName())
.resolve();
print(type.getDeclaredFields().filter(named("toplevel")).getOnly());
print(type.getDeclaredFields().filter(named("nested")).getOnly());
}
private static void print(FieldDescription field) {
System.out.printf("field %s%ntype=%s%nannotations=%s%ntype=%s%n%n",
field.getName(),
field.getType(),
field.getType().getTypeArguments().get(0),
field.getType().getTypeArguments().get(0).getDeclaredAnnotations());
}
这将给出您期望的输出:
field toplevel
type=net.bytebuddy.Toplevel<java.lang.Integer>
annotations=class java.lang.Integer
type=[@net.bytebuddy.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Anno()]
field nested
type=net.bytebuddy.AnnotationOnTypeArgument.net.bytebuddy.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Nested<java.lang.Integer>
annotations=class java.lang.Integer
type=[@net.bytebuddy.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Anno()]
我花了一些时间进行调试,annotatedParameterizedType变量似乎仍然在其allOnSameTargetTypeAnnotations字段中包含对Anno注释的引用。
annotatedParameterizedType = {AnnotatedTypeFactory$AnnotatedParameterizedTypeImpl@539}
type = {ParameterizedTypeImpl@540} "com.sample.Toplevel<java.lang.Integer>"
decl = {Field@538} "com.sample.Toplevel com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument.toplevel"
location = {TypeAnnotation$LocationInfo@543}
depth = 0
locations = {TypeAnnotation$LocationInfo$Location[0]@549}
allOnSameTargetTypeAnnotations = {TypeAnnotation[1]@544}
0 = {TypeAnnotation@551} "@com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Anno() with Targetnfo: FIELD: -2, -2 on base declaration: com.sample.Toplevel com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument.toplevel"
annotations = {LinkedHashMap@546} size = 0
和
annotatedParameterizedType = {AnnotatedTypeFactory$AnnotatedParameterizedTypeImpl@602}
type = {ParameterizedTypeImpl@603} "com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument.com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Nested<java.lang.Integer>"
decl = {Field@601} "com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Nested com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument.nested"
location = {TypeAnnotation$LocationInfo@606}
depth = 1
locations = {TypeAnnotation$LocationInfo$Location[1]@611}
allOnSameTargetTypeAnnotations = {TypeAnnotation[1]@607}
0 = {TypeAnnotation@612} "@com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Anno() with Targetnfo: FIELD: -2, -2 on base declaration: com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument$Nested com.sample.AnnotationOnTypeArgument.nested"
annotations = {LinkedHashMap@608} size = 0
但是位置深度有所不同,AnnotatedTypeFactory的getnotatedactualtypearguments()方法包含一个TypeAnnotation.isSameLocationInfo()比较,作为向注释映射添加元素的先决条件,在嵌套情况下该比较将变为false,因此最终没有添加元素
我也没有找到任何关于它的文档。也许你在这里发现了一个问题