Scalamock模拟通用Java接口超载方法



我正在尝试模拟具有不同数量参数的过载方法的Java通用接口。接口代码是:

import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
public interface GOInterface<T> {
    void send(T record);
    void send(T record, Callable<T> onComplete);
}

我尝试使用oncomplete功能模拟发送的发送:

导入java.util.concurrent.callable

import org.scalamock.scalatest.MockFactory
import org.scalatest.{FlatSpec, Matchers}
class JavaInterfaceTest extends FlatSpec with Matchers with MockFactory {
  behavior of "scalamock"
  it should "mock java generic interface with overloaded method (with different number of parameters)" in {
    var result = ""
    val m = mock[GOInterface[String]]
    (m.send(_: String, _: Callable[String])).expects(*, *)
      .onCall{ case(s: String, c: Callable[String]) => c.call()}.once
    m.send("hello", new Callable[String] {
      override def call(): String = {result = "world"; result}
    })
    result should be("world")
  }

  it should "mock java generic interface with overloaded method (with different number of parameters) 2" in {
    var result = ""
    val m = mock[GOInterface[String]]
    (m.send(_: String)).expects(*).once
    m.send("hello")
    result should be("")
  }
}

我从编译器遇到的错误是:

error: value expects is not a member of (String, java.util.concurrent.Callable[String]) => Unit
[ERROR]     (m.send(_: String, _: Callable[String])).expects(*, *)
[ERROR]                                              ^
error: value expects is not a member of String => Unit
[ERROR]     (m.send(_: String)).expects(*).once
[ERROR]    

查看Scalamock Git上的不同示例,我可以看到没有测试可以使用具有不同param计数的过载方法检查通用接口。

我的依赖性是:

        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.scalamock</groupId>
            <artifactId>scalamock-scalatest-support_2.11</artifactId>
            <version>3.6.0</version>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.scalamock</groupId>
            <artifactId>scalamock-core_2.11</artifactId>
            <version>3.6.0</version>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>

我在Scalamock repo中创建了一个错误。

我设法克服了这个问题。不是最干净的方式,而是它的作品。正如@philippm所建议的那样,我需要修复类型,但不幸的是,这还不够,我需要创建一个虚拟类。这是对我有用的解决方案:

class JavaInterfaceTest extends FlatSpec with Matchers with MockFactory {
  behavior of "scalamock"
  class StringInterface extends GOInterface[String] {
    override def send(record: String): Unit = ()
    override def send(record: String, onComplete: Callable[String]): Unit = ()
  }
  val call: (String, Callable[String]) => Unit = { case(s: String, c: Callable[String]) => c.call()}
  it should "mock java generic interface with overloaded method (with different number of parameters)" in {
    var result = ""
    val m = mock[StringInterface]
    (m.send(_: String, _: Callable[String])).expects(*, *)
      .onCall{ call }.once
    m.send("hello", new Callable[String] {
      override def call(): String = {result = "world"; result}
    })
    result should be("world")
  }

  it should "mock java generic interface with overloaded method (with different number of parameters) 2" in {
    var result = ""
    val m = mock[StringInterface]
    (m.send(_: String)).expects(*).once
    m.send("hello")
    result should be("")
  }
}

我觉得这有点丑陋,当需要嘲笑更复杂的界面时,它可能会最糟糕,但我希望它可以帮助他人。

首先,我建议升级到最新版本的scalamock,但是那里也可能存在仿制药和过载的角案例。

要解决这个问题,在许多情况下,它有助于先锁定类型,然后创建一个模拟:

trait StringGoInterface extends GoInterface[String]
val m = mock[StringGoInterface]

相关内容

  • 没有找到相关文章