事务(进程 ID 84)在与另一个进程的锁资源上死锁,并被选为死锁受害者



>我开发了一个监控应用程序。因此,我使用了一个计时器函数来检查SQL表中的某些值。

尽管有这么多函数,但它为一个名为getLogEntry()的函数给出了以下错误

message>Transaction (Process ID 84) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.</message>
<innerMessage>
</innerMessage>
<source>.Net SqlClient Data Provider</source>
<stackTrace>at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.HasMoreRows()
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.ReadInternal(Boolean setTimeout)
   at ShiftAlertSystem.DBAccess.getLogEntry(Int32 nEventLogIdn, connections cn)</stackTrace>
    <createdAt>2012/06/18 13:10:47</createdAt>

这是函数的实现

public LogEntry getLogEntry(int nEventLogIdn, connections cn)
    {
        lock (_objLock)
        {
            LogEntry lgEntObj = new LogEntry();
             SqlConnection NewCon3 = new SqlConnection();
             SqlCommand newCmd2 = null;
             SqlDataReader dr = null;
             try
             {

                 string connectString;
                 // Configuration config = ConfigurationManager.u
                 string DataSource = cryptIT.Decrypt(cn.DataSource_bio);
                 string initialCatalog = cryptIT.Decrypt(cn.InitialCatalog_bio);
                 string user = cryptIT.Decrypt(cn.user_bio);
                 string password = cryptIT.Decrypt(cn.password_bio);
                 bool intergratedSecurity = cn.IntegratedSecurity_bio;
                 if (intergratedSecurity)
                 {
                     connectString = "Data Source=" + DataSource + ";Initial Catalog=" + initialCatalog + ";Integrated Security=True";
                 }
                 else
                 {
                     connectString = "Data Source=" + DataSource + ";Initial Catalog=" + initialCatalog + ";User ID=" + user + ";Password=" + password;
                 }
                 NewCon3 = new SqlConnection(connectString);
                 NewCon3.Open();

                 newCmd2 = NewCon3.CreateCommand();
                 newCmd2.Connection = NewCon3;
                 newCmd2.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
                 newCmd2.CommandText = @"
                                 SELECT [nUserID]
                                        ,[sUserName]
                                        ,dateadd(s,[nDateTime],'1970/1/1') AS LogDateTime
                                        ,[nEventIdn]
                                        ,[nTNAEvent]
                                        ,[TB_READER].[nReaderIdn]
                                        ,[sName]
                                 FROM 
                                        [TB_EVENT_LOG]
                                        ,[TB_USER]
                                        ,[TB_READER]
                                WHERE 
                                        [nEventLogIdn] = " + nEventLogIdn +
                                         @" AND
                                        [TB_EVENT_LOG].[nUserID] = [TB_USER].[sUserID]
                                        AND
                                        [nFlag]= 1
                                        AND
                                        [TB_EVENT_LOG].[nReaderIdn]=[TB_READER].[nReaderIdn]"
                                         ;
                 dr = newCmd2.ExecuteReader();
                 if (dr != null && dr.Read())
                 {
                     lgEntObj.nUserID = dr.GetInt32(0);
                     lgEntObj.nUserName = dr.GetString(1);
                     lgEntObj.LogDateTime = dr.GetDateTime(2);
                     lgEntObj.nEventIdn = dr.GetInt32(3);
                     lgEntObj.nTNAEvent = dr.GetInt16(4);
                     lgEntObj.nReaderIdn = dr.GetInt32(5);
                     lgEntObj.sName = dr.GetString(6);
                 }
                 dr.Close();
                 newCmd2.Dispose();
                 // NewCon.Close();
                 NewCon3.Close();
                 return lgEntObj;
             }
             catch (Exception exc)
             {
                 CenUtility.ErrorLog.CreateLog(exc);
                 return null;
             }
             finally
             {
                 if (dr != null)
                     dr.Close(); 
                 if(newCmd2 != null)
                     newCmd2.Dispose();

                     NewCon3.Close();

             }

        }
    }

提前致谢

您可能希望参考此问题以获取一些更有用的建议。

我使用以下模式进行数据库重试;在本例中,我们返回一个 DataTable,但无论如何,该模式都是相同的;您根据 SqlException 编号检测 SqlDeadlock 或超时,然后重试,最多 n 次。

    public DataTable DoSomeSql(int retryCount = 1)
    {
        try
        {
            //Run Stored Proc/Adhoc SQL here
        }
        catch (SqlException sqlEx)
        {
            if (retryCount == MAX_RETRY_COUNT) //5, 7, Whatever
            {
                log.Error("Unable to DoSomeSql, reached maximum number of retries.");
                throw;
            }
            switch (sqlEx.Number)
            {
                case DBConstants.SQL_DEADLOCK_ERROR_CODE: //1205
                    log.Warn("DoSomeSql was deadlocked, will try again.");
                    break;
                case DBConstants.SQL_TIMEOUT_ERROR_CODE: //-2
                    log.Warn("DoSomeSql was timedout, will try again.");
                    break;
                default:
                    log.WarnFormat(buf.ToString(), sqlEx);
                    break;
            }
            System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); //Can also use Math.Rand for a random interval of time
            return DoSomeSql(asOfDate, ++retryCount);
        }
    }

您的查询与另一个查询陷入僵局。 另一个查询很可能是insertupdatedelete查询,因为select本身不会死锁。

如果你不太在乎一致性,你可以使用with (nolock)提示:

FROM 
    [TB_EVENT_LOG] with (nolock)
    ,[TB_USER] with (nolock)
    ,[TB_READER] with (nolock)

这将导致您的查询不放置锁。 没有锁的查询不会导致死锁。 缺点是,当它与修改查询同时运行时,它可能会返回不一致的数据。

最新更新