Select Object-First会影响管道中以前的cmdlet



cmdlets应该为管道中间实现的PowerShellStrongly Encouraged Development Guidelines,但我怀疑这对于Select-Object的参数-Last来说是不可行的。只是因为你无法提前确定最后一个条目。换句话说:您需要等待输入流完成,直到定义最后一个条目
为了证明这一点,我写了一个小脚本:

$Data = 1..5 | ForEach-Object {[pscustomobject]@{Index = "$_"}}
$Data | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'Before' $_.Index; $_ } |
Select-Object -Last 5 | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'After' $_.Index }

并将其与Select-Object *:进行比较

$Data | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'Before' $_.Index; $_ } |
Select-Object * | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'After' $_.Index }

带结果(右:Select-Object -Last 5,左:Select-Object *(:

-Last 5  *
-------  -
Before 1 Before 1
Before 2 After 1
Before 3 Before 2
Before 4 After 2
Before 5 Before 3
After 1  After 3
After 2  Before 4
After 3  After 4
After 4  Before 5
After 5  After 5

尽管这没有记录在案,但我认为我可以从中得出结论,-Last参数确实会阻塞管道
这没什么大不了的,但我也针对-First参数进行了测试,得到了一些令人不安的结果。为了更好地显示这一点,我没有选择所有对象,而是只选择**-First 2**:

$Data | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'Before' $_.Index; $_ } |
Select-Object -First 2 | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'After' $_.Index }
Before 1
After 1
Before 2
After 2

请注意,使用-First 2参数时,以下cmdlet不仅显示两个对象,而且前面的cmdlet(ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'Before' $_.Index; $_ }(也仅显示2个对象(而不是5个(

显然,-First参数直接引用到先前cmdlet的对象中,这与使用-Last 2参数不同

$Data | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'Before' $_.Index; $_ } |
Select-Object -Last 2 | ForEach-Object { Write-Host 'After' $_.Index }
Before 1
Before 2
Before 3
Before 4
Before 5
After 4
After 5

当使用Out-Host而不是Write-Hostcmdlet或将结果发送到变量(如:(时,也会发生这种情况

$Before = ""; $After = ""
$Data | ForEach-Object { $Before += $_.Index; $_ } | Select-Object -First 2 | ForEach-Object { $After += $_.Index }
$Before
$After

这在Windows Powershell(5.1.18362.628(和Powershell Core(7.0.0(上都显示
这是个错误吗?

Select-Object通过欺骗影响上游命令

这听起来可能像个笑话,但事实并非如此。

为了优化流水线流传输性能,Select-Object使用了一个普通用户无法开发Cmdlet的技巧——它抛出一个StopUpstreamCommandsException

一旦被捕获,运行时(间接(会对前面的所有命令调用StopProcessing(),但不会将其视为终止错误事件,从而允许下游cmdlet继续执行。

当你在管道的早期有缓慢或计算量大的命令时,这是非常有用的:

# this will only take ~3 seconds to return with the StopUpstreamCommand behavior
# but would have incurred 8 extra seconds of "waiting to discard" otherwise
Measure-Command {
1..5 |ForEach-Object { Start-Sleep -Seconds 1; $_ } |Select-Object -First 3
}

最新更新