所以我在assemply中编程,这只是一个简单的代码,所以我可以学习如何分配数组,以便稍后在NEON编程中使用它们。
ASM_FUNC(FPE)
.data
.balign 8
array: .skip 80
array1: .word 10,20,30,40
.text
ldr x0,=array
mov x1,#10
check:
cmp x1,#1
bne loop
b exit
loop:
str x1,[x0],#8 //Stores the value in x1 into x0 and moves the address +8 bytes
sub x1,x1,#1 //x1--
b check
exit:
mov x0,#11
ret
因此,对某些部分进行了注释,以便我可以尝试找到代码的中断位置(我的系统上没有调试(
我开始评论计算部分,并在ret之前的末尾添加了mov x0,#11,以查看问题是否在计算上。事实证明不是。当我取消对数组的注释:.skip 80和ldr x0,=array时,如果没有响应,我的应用程序就会一直停留在那里。
有人能告诉我我做错了什么吗?我在armv8组件上使用A64
从这个c程序调用入口点:
void PocAsm_EntryPoint ( )
{
Print(L"========== ASM ==========n");
UINT32 fff = FPE();
Print(L" %d n",fff);
Print(L"=========== ASM ===========n");
Print(L"Test version 0.24 n");
return 0;
}
不幸的是,我没有找到打印的定义,所以我向道歉
这是试图回答以下问题:FPE()
函数是否按预期工作,同时使用qemu-system-aarch64
和GDB
等标准工具从等式中删除所有其他内容。
FPE()
函数的代码将为Cortex-A53 qemu-virt机器编译。
先决条件:
- qemu-system-aarch64已安装:
Ubuntu 20.04:sudo apt-get install qemu-system-arm
Windows 10:从这里下载并安装qemu-w64-setup-20201120.exe
安装程序。
- 已安装
Cortex-A
的aarch64-none-elf
工具链。它可以从ARM网站下载。Linux和Windows 10都有版本
FPE.s
:
.arch armv8-a
.file "FPE.s"
.data
.balign 8
.globl array
array: .skip 80
array1: .word 10,20,30,40
.text
.align 2
.globl FPE
FPE:
ldr x0,=array
mov x1,#10
check:
cmp x1,#1
bne loop
b exit
loop:
str x1,[x0],#8 //Stores the value in x1 into x0 and moves the address +8 bits
sub x1,x1,#1 //x1--
b check
exit:
mov x0,#11
ret
.end
startup.s
:
.title startup64.s
.arch armv8-a
.text
.section .text.startup,"ax"
.globl _start
_start:
ldr x0, =__StackTop
mov sp, x0
bl FPE
wait: wfe
b wait
.end
建筑:
我们将为qemu-virt机器构建FPE.elf
(RAM从0x40000000
开始(:
/opt/arm/9/gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-elf/bin/aarch64-none-elf-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -ffreestanding -g -Wl,--defsym,__StackTop=0x40010000 -Wl,--section-start=.text=0x40000000 -o FPE.elf startup.s FPE.s
调试:
在shell中启动qemu:
/opt/qemu-5.1.0/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 -semihosting -m 1M -nographic -serial telnet::4444,server,nowait -machine virt,gic-version=2,secure=on,virtualization=on -S -gdb tcp::1234,ipv4 -cpu cortex-a53 -kernel FPE.elf
启动GDB
:
opt/arm/9/gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-elf/bin/aarch64-none-elf-gdb --quiet -nx -ex 'target remote localhost:1234' -ex 'load' --ex 'b _start' -ex 'b exit' FPE.elf
GDB
应启动:
Reading symbols from FPE.elf...
Remote debugging using localhost:1234
_start () at startup.s:7
7 ldr x0, =__StackTop
Loading section .text, size 0x50 lma 0x40000000
Loading section .data, size 0x60 lma 0x40010050
Start address 0x40000000, load size 176
Transfer rate: 85 KB/sec, 88 bytes/write.
Breakpoint 1 at 0x40000000: file startup.s, line 7.
Breakpoint 2 at 0x40000040: file FPE.s, line 28.
从这一点开始,命令stepi
、p/x $x0
和x/10g 0x40010050
可以用于监视程序行为,直到它到达exit
标签。
我们将在这里显示数组中开始和退出断点处的10个元素:
gdb) x/10g 0x40010050
0x40010050: 0 0
0x40010060: 0 0
0x40010070: 0 0
0x40010080: 0 0
0x40010090: 0 0
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, exit () at FPE.s:28
28 mov x0,#11
(gdb) x/10g 0x40010050
0x40010050: 10 9
0x40010060: 8 7
0x40010070: 6 5
0x40010080: 4 3
0x40010090: 2 0
从这一点开始的单步操作表明程序从执行中正确返回:
(gdb) stepi
29 ret
(gdb) stepi
wait () at startup.s:10
10 wait: wfe
(gdb) stepi
11 b wait
(gdb) stepi
10 wait: wfe
因此,问题的答案是:是的,FPE()
函数的代码工作正常。
完全相同的过程可以在Windows 10上运行,这只是调整用于运行aarch64-none-elf-gcc
、qemu-system-aarch64
和GDB
的三个命令的问题。
将对象文件的转储与我测试的文件进行比较可能有助于理解问题:
/opt.arm/9/gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-elf/bin/aarch64-none-elf-as -o FPE.o FPE.s
/opt/arm/9/gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-elf/bin/aarch64-none-elf-objdump -D FPE.o
FPE.o: file format elf64-littleaarch64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <FPE>:
0: 58000140 ldr x0, 28 <exit+0x8>
4: d2800141 mov x1, #0xa // #10
0000000000000008 <check>:
8: f100043f cmp x1, #0x1
c: 54000041 b.ne 14 <loop> // b.any
10: 14000004 b 20 <exit>
0000000000000014 <loop>:
14: f8008401 str x1, [x0], #8
18: d1000421 sub x1, x1, #0x1
1c: 17fffffb b 8 <check>
0000000000000020 <exit>:
20: d2800160 mov x0, #0xb // #11
24: d65f03c0 ret
...
Disassembly of section .data:
0000000000000000 <array>:
...
0000000000000050 <array1>:
50: 0000000a .inst 0x0000000a ; undefined
54: 00000014 .inst 0x00000014 ; undefined
58: 0000001e .inst 0x0000001e ; undefined
5c: 00000028 .inst 0x00000028 ; undefined
转储最小示例的完整ELF文件将给出:
opt/arm/9/gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-elf/bin/aarch64-none-elf-objdump -D FPE.elf
FPE.elf: file format elf64-littleaarch64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000040000000 <_start>:
40000000: 580000c0 ldr x0, 40000018 <wait+0xc>
40000004: 9100001f mov sp, x0
40000008: 94000006 bl 40000020 <FPE>
000000004000000c <wait>:
4000000c: d503205f wfe
40000010: 17ffffff b 4000000c <wait>
40000014: 00000000 .inst 0x00000000 ; undefined
40000018: 40010000 .inst 0x40010000 ; undefined
4000001c: 00000000 .inst 0x00000000 ; undefined
0000000040000020 <FPE>:
40000020: 58000140 ldr x0, 40000048 <exit+0x8>
40000024: d2800141 mov x1, #0xa // #10
0000000040000028 <check>:
40000028: f100043f cmp x1, #0x1
4000002c: 54000041 b.ne 40000034 <loop> // b.any
40000030: 14000004 b 40000040 <exit>
0000000040000034 <loop>:
40000034: f8008401 str x1, [x0], #8
40000038: d1000421 sub x1, x1, #0x1
4000003c: 17fffffb b 40000028 <check>
0000000040000040 <exit>:
40000040: d2800160 mov x0, #0xb // #11
40000044: d65f03c0 ret
40000048: 40010050 .inst 0x40010050 ; undefined
4000004c: 00000000 .inst 0x00000000 ; undefined
Disassembly of section .data:
0000000040010050 <__data_start>:
...
00000000400100a0 <array1>:
400100a0: 0000000a .inst 0x0000000a ; undefined
400100a4: 00000014 .inst 0x00000014 ; undefined
400100a8: 0000001e .inst 0x0000001e ; undefined
400100ac: 00000028 .inst 0x00000028 ; undefined